Legal Opinion
Steele v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Decided March 29, 1991No. CR-89-177PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ON RETURN TO REMAND
TAYLOR, Judge.
The appellant, Howard Lugene Steele, was convicted of two counts of the sale of a material containing cocaine. We remanded this case so that the trial court could hold an evidentiary hearing on the issues which appellant raises on appeal. 571 So.2d 412 (Ala.Cr.App.1990). The record shows that the jury sent a note to the judge which read as follows:
“Sir — The jury is in full agreement that the defendant did sell a controlled substance to Officer Richardson. However, eleven of twelve of us do not feel that the State produced enough evidence to support our belief.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Bartley Burns and Lawrence KellyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Donahoo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Recoba v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McKinney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993