Legal Opinion

RWR v. EKB

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 2001No. C-00-13PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[¶1] The district court determined that RWR (bLereafter "Father") was the biologic 1 father of NDB (hereafter "Child"). Father challenges that decision on a variety of grounds. The other parties to this appeal are the State of Wyoming, Division of Child Support Enforcement (State), Child's Mother, EKB (hereafter "Mother"), and JDB, who was married to Child's Mother at the time of Child's birth.

[¶ 21 We will affirm.

ISSUES

[¶3] Father raises these issues:

1) Did the District Court err when it ruled it was not required by the Wyoming Par*1226entage Act to recognize the parentage…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hall v. LalliArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Fontaine v. Board of County Com'rs of Park CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Wyoming Department of Transportation v. HaglundWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Matter of Paternity of SDMWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re Paternity of DAAPCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State, Div. of Child Support Ex Rel. NdbWyoming Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API