Legal Opinion
Darling v. Village of Herkimer
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 1957PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtE. Howard Riugrosb, J.
Motions pursuant to sections 457-a and 549 of the Civil Practice Act by the Villag’e of Herkimer, one of the defendants in this action, to set aside verdicts returned by the jury in the amount of $30,000 and $5,000, in favor of the plaintiffs, Lauanna Darling’ and Harry Darling*, respectively. A similar motion on behalf of the other defendant, Robert Ashley, has been denied.
The accident out of which the claims of these plaintiffs arose occurred at about 10 o’clock on the evening of September 27, 1955, at a point about one and one-half miles northerly of the corporation limits of the village…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stern v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- LaRue v. TiernanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Larue v. Tiernan, BorrmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- City of Mount Vernon v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- City of Olean v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dowling v. Consolidated Carriers Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. Sowle, New York County Courts1971
- Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc. v. Village of Kiryas JoelNew York Supreme Court · 2004
- Orange & Rockland Utils. v. Village of Kiryas JoelNew York Supreme Court, Orange County · 2004