Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided February 17, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

Office of the Attorney General — State of Texas John Cornyn Mr. Harold E. Feeney Credit Union Commissioner Credit Union Department 914 East Anderson Lane Austin, Texas 78752-1699

Re: Whether credit unions may recover from investigating authorities the cost of producing records in response to grand jury subpoenas, and related questions (RQ-0109-JC)

Dear Commissioner Feeney:

You ask whether credit unions may recover from the investigating authority the costs of retrieving and producing documents in response to a grand jury subpoena. We conclude that they may not.

You state that credit unions in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Bingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. In the Matter of a Grand Jury Subpoena Directed to Marc Rich & Co., A.G. Marc Rich & Co., A.G., a Swiss Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Ex Parte GouldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Pittsburgh National Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API