Legal Opinion

Krupp v. Sackwitz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 11, 1961No. Gen. 61-F-18PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSoheineman, J.

This proceeding originated in Prohate Court and was heard de novo in the Circuit Court. The purpose was to have plaintiff declared to be an heir of Albert F. Sackwitz, deceased. The prayer was denied after a hearing by the court without a jury. Plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court, which transferred the case to this court.

The plaintiff was bom out of wedlock, and her mother filed a suit in County Court in 1918 under the applicable statute then in force. A jury found that Albert F. Sackwitz was the father, and he was ordered to pay certain sums to the mother. He complied with that order,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. PenningtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Quinn v. LukanitschAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  3. Brainard v. BrainardIllinois Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of KarasIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re Estate of KarasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. BuckleyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1967
  4. Sodermark v. KarasIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Staker v. AinsworthUtah Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API