Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert Lee Willis
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 17, 1996No. 95-3311PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Robert Lee Willis appeals following a mistrial because of a hung jury and conviction after a second trial, on a two-count superseding indictment for conspiracy to commit bank larceny, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and § 2113(b) (Count 1), and for assault while attempting bank larceny, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(b) and (d) (Count 2). He received a sixty-month sentence on Count 1 and a mandatory life sentence on Count 2, to run concurrently. He appeals his conviction on the assault count contending that (1). the second trial violated his double jeopardy…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. CherryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Corry ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Christopher A. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Kevin GilmoreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.