Legal Opinion

Drake v. Drake

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 6, 1921No. 22,306PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis against Charles L. Drake and Boyal Indemnity Company, surety on his bond, to recover $545 balance alleged to be due for support of plaintiff, his wife. The motion of plaintiff for judgment on the pleadings was granted, Beed, J. From the judgment-entered pursuant to the order for judgment, defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

The defendant Drake was, on February 11, 1919, convicted of failing to furnish proper food, clothing and support to his wife, without lawful excuse, in the municipal court of Minneapolis. In connection therewith the court determined -and -ordered that he execute a bond to the state of Minnesota, in the amount of $1,000, with surety to be -approved by the court, under the provisions of section 8667, G. S. 1913, as amended by chapter 213, p. 308, Laws of 1917. On June 15, 1920, said defendant executed a bond in accordance with such order of the court, with the defendant Boyal Indemnity Company…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lanier v. IrvineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. HubbardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Smith v. HubbardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API