Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Davis

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 18, 2015No. 1150072Published

1Dissent

MOORE; Chief Justice

(dissenting).

“A defendant is constitutionally entitled to be informed of the nature and the cause of the accusation against him. U.S. Const, amend. VI; Ala. Const, art. I, § 6.” Ex parte Washington, 448 So.2d 404, 407 (Ala.1984). In this case, I believe that Kevin James Davis was deprived of his constitutional rights because his indictment “apprised [him] of the charge against him but he could not know the contentions of the state as to how he committed [the charged offense of manslaughter].” Nelson v. State, 50 Ala.App. 285, 288, 278 So.2d 734, 737 (Crim.App.1973). I…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Cole v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Smith v. O'GRADYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API