Crane v. Johnson
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
Appeal from an order denying an interlocutory injunction, three judges sitting. The court took jurisdiction of the action, citing Raich v. Truax, 219 Fed. Rep. 273, 283; Truax v. Raich, 239 U. S. 33; but denied the injunction on the ground that the averments of the complaint did not justify it.
Complainant is a drugless practitioner, he avers (we state the facts averred narratively), and has practiced his profession in the City and County of Los Angeles for the last seven years and is dependent upon it for making a living. He does not employ either medicine, drugs or surgery in his practice,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
3Cited by39 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Birnbaum v. TrussellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Lambert v. YellowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hayman v. City of GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Brinkley v. HassigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.