Legal Opinion

Stanley v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1924No. 1 Div. 574PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The testimony for the state tends to prove that the defendant and two boys were seen by the sheriff and his deputy at or near a still; that the still was a can, and a crooked pipe connected, and had a fire under it; that the still was located about one and one-balf miles from defendant’s borne in a bollow and in tbe woods; that, when the sheriff bailed defendant, defendant ran and was shot at by both tbe sheriff and tbe deputy; that no arrest was made at tbe time, and none was made until after an indictment was returned. Tbe testimony as a whole makes tbe identity of defendant somewhat…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Biddle v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Harbin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Washington v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Bentley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Washington v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API