Legal Opinion
Carpenter v. Allen
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 6, 2025No. 3:14-cv-00741Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DANIEL CARPENTER, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 3:14-cv-741 (SRU) v. LYNN ALLEN, et al., Defendants. ORDER Daniel Carpenter (“Carpenter”) and Grist Mill Capital, LLC (“GMC”) have filed a Rule 59(e) Motion to Alter or Amend the judgment against them. The motion is alternatively styled as a Rule 60(b)(6) Motion for Relief from Judgment. For the reasons that follow, I deny the motion, doc. no. 143. I. Standard of Review The standard for granting motions for reconsideration is “strict.” D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 7(c)1. Motions for reconsideration “will…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Samuel Nemaizer, General Manager of the New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear and Allied Workers' Union I.L.G.W.U. v. Jack Baker, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Aczel v. LaboniaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Frank McKithen v. Richard Brown, District Attorney, County of Queens, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.