People v. Grant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unani*1093mously affirmed. Memorandum: The requests for an adjournment and a mistrial, based upon defendant’s alleged need to obtain further psychiatric evaluations, were properly denied. Defendant had ample opportunity to obtain such evaluations in support of a possible insanity defense prior to the commencement of trial (see, People v Herring, 225 AD2d 1065; People v Santos, 179 AD2d 790, 791, lv denied 79 NY2d 953). County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for recusal (see, People v Montgomery, 224 AD2d 914). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the court had the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. GuzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. LibertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- People v. MontgomeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. SantosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. OwensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. GonzalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. CottonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. DavidsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. TaylorNew York Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.