Legal Opinion

Seaman v. Waltemire

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1922No. Appeal, No. 86PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

But one question of fact was raised on the trial of this action of ejectment: Did George M. Waltemire, the defendant, at the time he accepted the deed from his mother, for five and one-fourth acres of land, know that she had, nearly four years previously, executed and delivered a deed to his brother, Torrence H. Waltemire, (under whom the plaintiff claims) for three acres thereof, the premises in suit, which deed was then unrecorded? This issue the jury decided adversely to the defendant.

Thé defendant, however, presented a point for binding instructions, based,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Borough of Harrisburg v. CrangleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
  2. Hagey v. DetweilerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
  3. Smith v. BrotherlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  4. Emig v. DiehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  5. Clement & Masser v. Youngman & WalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tompkins Et Ux v. HeadleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Weaver v. Reinhart, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API