United States v. Stafoff
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Chris Elioff Stafoff, alias Chris Elioff, and another, were indicted for setting up a_ still without registering it, and for making a mash fit for the prodúcton of distilled spirits, and they demur to the indictment.
1Opinion of the Court
PARIS, District Judge.
Defendants are being prosecuted on an indictment wherein the first count charges them with the violation of section 3258, R. S. (Comp. St. § 5994), and the second count thereof with the violation of section 3282, R. S. (Comp. St. § 6022). They demur to these counts, for that, as they contend, sections 3258 and 3282 were repealed by the provisions of the Volstead Act. Act Oct. 28, 1919 (41 Stat. 305). Sections 3258 and 3282, supra, are contained among the provisions of the law relating to internal revenue, and they were obviously intended and designed originally as parts…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- United States v. FortmanDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1920
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. StafoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Goldberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Maresca v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Fontenot v. AccardoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
- Ketchum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.