Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Platt v. Stewart

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1862Published

Error to Shiawassee Circuit.

1Concurrence

Martin Ch. J.:

I concur with my brethren that the judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted. But I concur in the result, for the reason that I think the bill in the suit in Chancery between Goodhue and Child, Whitehouse and others, was insufficient to make Whitehouse a party, and because the right and title of Whitehouse was not determined by the decree. His interest was not set out as required by the statute, and the master reported that he had none, when in fact he had the whole of Child’s title, by a deed duly recorded. The decree therefore virtually dismissed the bill as to him;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Maynards v. CornwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1854

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API