Legal Opinion
Lloyd v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided March 9, 1934No. 25,946PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTreanor, J.
This is an appeal from a conviction for second degree murder. Appellant assigns that the court erred in overruling his motion for new trial. The grounds for new trial, urged in the motion, are as follows:
“1. Irregularities in the procedure of the court in this to wit: That the defendant employed W. E. Henderson and H. R. Wilson, Jr., duly admitted attorneys to practice law in this court, to defend Tiim as charged in the indictment; notwithstanding this fact the defendant was forced to trial on a day’s notice without notice to his attorneys, and without his attorneys employed by him;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McDermott v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Keyes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Hendryx v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Harris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Madison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
- Noelke v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
- Holt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
- Wahl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
- Heglin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.