Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1934No. 25,946PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTreanor, J.

This is an appeal from a conviction for second degree murder. Appellant assigns that the court erred in overruling his motion for new trial. The grounds for new trial, urged in the motion, are as follows:

“1. Irregularities in the procedure of the court in this to wit: That the defendant employed W. E. Henderson and H. R. Wilson, Jr., duly admitted attorneys to practice law in this court, to defend Tiim as charged in the indictment; notwithstanding this fact the defendant was forced to trial on a day’s notice without notice to his attorneys, and without his attorneys employed by him;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McDermott v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Keyes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hendryx v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Harris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Madison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Noelke v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Holt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Wahl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Heglin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API