Legal Opinion
MUSEBECK BY MUSEBECK v. Heckler
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 2, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CLIFFORD SCOTT GREEN, District Judge.
This is an appeal under sections 205(g) and 1631(c)(3) of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) (1982), from a final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”) finding that plaintiff, Barbara Musebeck, engaged in substantial gainful activity during a nine month period (January-June, August-October) in 1980 (“critical period”), and therefore was no longer disabled as of November, 1980. For reasons demonstrated below, I find that plaintiff’s clearly subsidized earnings, standing alone, do not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- George Dobrowolsky v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary, Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Bernice F. Stark v. Caspar W. Weinberger (Successor to Elliot Richardson)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Merle C. Fowler v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Herbert E. Coulter v. Casper W. Weinberger, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Buchman v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Buchman v. Wayne Trace Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995