Bancroft v. Atyeo & Herman
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Lyon District Court. ■ At the March Term, 1878, of the district court, Atyeo & Herman, as plaintiffs, had judgment against Bancroft, as defendant, for $67.24, and costs. Bancroft brings the case here for review. The opinion contains a sufficient statement of the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action brought by Atyeo & Herman against E. P. Bancroft for a balance due on an account for meat. The action was commenced before a justice of the peace, where judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant for the amount claimed. The defendant then took the case to the district court on petition in error, where the judgment of the justice was affirmed. The defendant (plaintiff in error) then brought the case to this court on petition in error. The defendant (plaintiff in error) now claims, and…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Idaho Irrigation Co. v. DillIdaho Supreme Court · 1914
- In re WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- State v. Alvarado-MerazSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025