Legal Opinion
Carol Harley v. Guilio Agostini
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 28, 2005No. 03-3654, 03-3655PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.
Participants and beneficiaries (hereinafter “Participants”) of a pension plan appeal from the district court’s orders denying their motions to vacate its judgments under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). In earlier proceedings, Participants of the Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (“3M”) Employee Retirement Income Plan brought two class actions against 3M and certain of its employees alleging that 3M breached its fiduciary duties under ERISA, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. The district court1 entered summary judgments for 3M and its…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Larry J. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Carol Harley v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Carol Harley v. Guillo AgostiniCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Robert C. Atkinson, an Individual Robert C. Atkinson, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Prudential Property Company, Inc., an Illinois Corporation Defendant-Third Party-Plaintiff-Appellee Graybow-Daniels Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. Westburne Supply, Inc., a Delaware Corporation United Westburne, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994