Legal Opinion

Wehby v. Turpin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 20, 1998No. 1960833PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

On Application for Rehearing

The opinion of December 19, 1997, is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor.

This case centers around a water-rights dispute involving a reconstructed man-made lake located near Chelsea, Alabama. The plaintiffs, Norman A. Wehby and Nancy H. Wehby, own property in a residential area (hereinafter "Chelsea Place"); that property includes a portion of the bed and shoreline of the lake. Two streams flow into the lake, including…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Hurst v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. White Sands Group, L.L.C. v. Prs II, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  2. Orr v. MortvedtSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  3. White's Mill Colony, Inc. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Ace Equipment Sales, Inc. v. BuccinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. Blackburn v. LefebvreCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API