Legal Opinion

Sacramento Dep't of Health & Human Servs. v. A.L. (In re A.K.)

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided May 9, 2017No. C081545PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButz, J.

*495Appellants A.L. (mother) and S.K. (father), appeal from the juvenile court's orders terminating parental rights and freeing the minor for adoption. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 366.26, 395.)1 They contend the juvenile court erred in determining the beneficial relationship exception to adoption did not apply. Father also contends the juvenile court should have continued the hearing to consider placement of the minor with the paternal grandmother. We affirm the juvenile court's orders.

*847FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On March 5, 2014, Sacramento Department of Health and Human Services (the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Laura C.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Mary H.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. In Re Gary P.California Court of Appeal · 1995

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shasta Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. R.T. (In re J.Y.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. Shauna R. (In re Cody R.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. In re A.J. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. In re B.S. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. In re Cody R.California Court of Appeal · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API