Legal Opinion

Fort Smith & Van Buren District v. Kidd

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 8, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellee sued the Fort Smith '& Van Burén District, hereinafter referred to as the district, and the Fort Smith Light and Traction Company, hereinafter referred to as the company, to recover damages for false arrest and imprisonment. He recovered judgment in the sum of $1 against both defendants, and both have appealed.

Appellee took passage in Fort Smith for Van Burén on one of the company’s cars, and paid the fare, which is collected before crossing the bridge over the Arkansas River connecting the two cities. A different collector collects the fare over the bridge, and it is the custom for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shibley v. Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Wood v. Drainage District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  3. Jones v. Sewer Improvement District No. 3Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  4. Board of Improvement of Sewer District Number 2 v. MorelandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Mahoney v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. WallerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  2. Arkansas Central Power Co. v. HildrethSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API