Legal Opinion
Loza v. Apfel
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 13, 2000No. 98-50892PublishedCited by 325 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENNIS, Circuit Judge:
The Commissioner of Social Security, concluding that Fidel G. Loza (“Mr. Loza”) was not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act, denied his claim for Social Security disability insurance benefits. See 42 U.S.C. § 423 (1991). Mr. Loza brought an action in the district court for judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (1991). The parties consented to have the case reviewed by a magistrate judge who affirmed the Commissioner’s decision. Mr. Loza appealed. We reverse the district court judgment and remand the case for…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Newton v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Patricia GREENSPAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by325 opinions
- Grogan v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Karen Lambert v. Andrew SaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Janice Newell v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Krystal Goins v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Carey v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
320 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.