First National Bank of New Haven v. Moir
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Edgcomb, J.:
I have no hesitancy in holding that the note which forms the basis of this action was executed by the defendant Moir and delivered by him to the defendant Hackett without consideration, and for the express purpose of enabling the latter to discount the instrument and turn the proceeds over to Mr. Moir. This Hackett failed to do. He wrongfully diverted the note from the purpose-for which it was given and delivered to him; he turned it over to the defendant Kneen in breach of faith for purposes of his ownz Hackett was not a holder in due course.
Therefore, the plaintiff cannot rely…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Canajoharie National Bank v. DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Coddington v. BayCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1822
- Cheever v. Pittsburgh, Shenango & Lake Erie RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Kelso Co. v. . EllisNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- German-American Bank v. CunninghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.