Haro v. Walmart Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AMADO HARO and ROCHELLE No. 1:21-cv-00239-ADA-SKO ORTEGA, on behalf of themselves and all 12 others similarly situated, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 Plaintiffs, THAT PLAINIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE BE DENIED, PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR 14 v. CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION OF FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION BE 15 WALMART, INC., GRANTED, AND RECOMMENDING PLAINIFFS’ PROPOSED COLLECTIVE 16 Defendant. ACTION NOTICE PLAN BE APPROVED IN PART 17 (Docs. 41, 44, 70) 18 19 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 Before the Court is Plaintiffs Amado…