People v. Dumay
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentPigott, J.
The majority states the correct standard for whether a misdemeanor complaint is jurisdictionally defective, but then misapplies the rule in this case. Therefore, I dissent.
Under the Criminal Procedure Law, “[t]he factual part of a misdemeanor complaint must allege ‘facts of an evidentiary character’ (CPL 100.15 [3]) demonstrating ‘reasonable cause’ to believe the defendant committed the crime charged (CPL 100.40 [4] [b])” (People v Dreyden, 15 NY3d 100, 102-103 [2010], quoting People v Dumas, 68 NY2d 729, 731 [1986]). “[T]he charge must be supported by evidentiary facts showing the basis for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. KalinNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. DreydenNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.