Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Dumay

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 2014Published

1DissentPigott, J.

The majority states the correct standard for whether a misdemeanor complaint is jurisdictionally defective, but then misapplies the rule in this case. Therefore, I dissent.

Under the Criminal Procedure Law, “[t]he factual part of a misdemeanor complaint must allege ‘facts of an evidentiary character’ (CPL 100.15 [3]) demonstrating ‘reasonable cause’ to believe the defendant committed the crime charged (CPL 100.40 [4] [b])” (People v Dreyden, 15 NY3d 100, 102-103 [2010], quoting People v Dumas, 68 NY2d 729, 731 [1986]). “[T]he charge must be supported by evidentiary facts showing the basis for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. KalinNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. People v. CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. People v. DreydenNew York Court of Appeals · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API