Legal Opinion
Verb v. Motorola, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided November 12, 1996No. 1-93-3248PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
delivered the modified opinion of the court upon denial of rehearing:
Plaintiffs Robert Verb and others similarly situated, who purchased cellular telephones from defendants Motorola and other similar companies, appeal from an order of the circuit court dismissing their second amended complaint against defendants pursuant to section 2 — 615 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (735 ILCS 5/2 — 615 (West 1992)) and their class allegations pursuant to sections 2 — 615 and 2 — 801 of the Code (735 ILCS 5/2 — 615, 2 — 801 (West 1992)). On appeal, plaintiffs contend that the trial court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Patrick Camasta v. Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Briehl v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. Tires ProductsDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
- Schiffner v. Motorola, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Yu v. International Business MacHines Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.