Legal Opinion

Ehlers v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1929No. 26513PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is a controversy over interest on an award by a commission appointed by the county judge of Douglas county to assess damages resulting from the taking of real estate for railroad purposes in a condemnation proceeding wherein the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company exercised the right of eminent domain. The proper*479ty condemned is described as the south 90% feet of lot 5 and all of lots 6 and 7, in block 221 of the original plat of Omaha. On one of the lots there were three houses occupied by tenants.

The present action is an independent suit in equity in the district court for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HaysNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Omaha Bridge & Terminal Railway Co. v. ReedNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. State v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad v. BatesNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Northeastern Nebraska Railroad v. FrazierNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. BevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. RCA Photophone Inc. v. HuffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Feltz v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  4. Gruntorad v. Hughes BrothersNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation Dist. v. FairchildCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API