Legal Opinion

People v. Cunningham

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 2013No. Docket No. 309277PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

AFTER REMAND

This matter returns to us following our remand to the sentencing court to determine in light of People v Sanders, 296 Mich App 710; 825 NW2d 87 (2012), whether the $1,000 in court costs imposed as part of defendant’s sentence was reasonable for felony cases in the Allegan Circuit Court. People v Cunningham, unpublished order of the Court of Appeals, entered Octo*220ber 2, 2012 (Docket No. 309277). We conclude that the prosecution established a sufficient factual basis for the amount of costs imposed and accordingly affirm.

Defendant’s sentence arose from his guilty plea to a charge of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SandersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. People v. SandersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. CunninghamMichigan Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API