People v. Cunningham
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
AFTER REMAND
This matter returns to us following our remand to the sentencing court to determine in light of People v Sanders, 296 Mich App 710; 825 NW2d 87 (2012), whether the $1,000 in court costs imposed as part of defendant’s sentence was reasonable for felony cases in the Allegan Circuit Court. People v Cunningham, unpublished order of the Court of Appeals, entered Octo*220ber 2, 2012 (Docket No. 309277). We conclude that the prosecution established a sufficient factual basis for the amount of costs imposed and accordingly affirm.
Defendant’s sentence arose from his guilty plea to a charge of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. SandersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. SandersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. CunninghamMichigan Supreme Court · 2014