Legal Opinion

Consolidated Cigar Corp. v. Brunner

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 19, 1945PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskje, J.

This cause is before us on the return of a rule to show cause why a peremptory or alternative writ of mandamus should not issue. Eelator, Consolidated Cigar Corporation, a corporation of the State of Delaware, seeks to compel respondent, George E. Brunner, director of the Department of Eeveriue and Finance of the City of Camden, to reduce the assessment on its personal property for the year of 1943 to the sum of $100,000, pursuant to its asserted agreement with respondent on December 9th, 1942.

The facts are substantially as follows: Eor the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rosen v. City of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Village of Ridgefield Park v. BERGEN CO. BD. OF TAXATIONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. Appeal of City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. City of Passaic v. Botany Mills, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API