Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 18, 1985No. 70630PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of armed robbery and burglary, and this appeal follows the denial of his motion for new trial. He cites the denial as error, along with five other enumerations. We affirm.

1. Appellant based his motion for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The evidence included appellant’s brother/co-defendant’s affidavit recanting his trial testimony, taking full responsibility for the crime, and absolving appellant of any connection to the crime. At trial appellant’s brother had denied that he or appellant engaged in the criminal activities alleged.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Timberlake v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Lunz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  5. Stephens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Butler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Atchison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API