United States v. Finkielstain
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
Defendant Jacobo Finkielstain has moved to bar the government from presenting at trial the depositions of Luis Lecueder and Andreas Blauer, taken and videotaped pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 15. He claims that both witnesses testified based on documents that were not available to him, thereby denying him confrontation rights guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment and discovery rights guaranteed by rule and statute, and violating evidentiary rules. For the reasons set forth below, the motions are granted in part and denied in part.
To the extent relevant to these…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Richard MastrangeloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Osvaldo Paternina-Vergara, Justino Reyes, Jerry Carter and Juan GanenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Counterclaim v. Terry Swann and Pamela Swann, Donald L. Rayburn, Defendant-CounterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- McKeown v. Woods HoleDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Hamner v. Tuscaloosa County School SystemDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021