Legal Opinion

Dotson v. Blankenship

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 22, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Clay

Affirming.

In this action by W. B. Blankenship against James A. Dotson and Mary Dotson, to recover for breach of warranty, plaintiff was awarded damages in the sum of $700, and defendants have appealed.

The facts are these: On November 22, 1921, appellants, in consideration of $1,200 cash, conveyed to appellee, with covenant of general warranty, á certain lot on Peter creek, Pike county, embracing what is known as the two Hall lots, and the Hymore lot. Following the description are these words:

“The intention of this deed is to convey all the land deed to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Foxwell v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  2. Lashley v. LashleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  3. Dotson v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  4. Bayes v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Sales v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. HodgkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API