Legal Opinion

Alexander v. City of Vicksburg

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the circuit court of "Warren county. Hon. J. D. Gilland, Judge. Appellant brought this action against the city of Vicksburg to recover the value of a horse which was struck and killed by a hose-reel, which was being rapidly driven to a fire in the corporate limits. It is admitted that the death of the horse was the direct result of negligence on the part of the driver of the hose-reel and that there was no negligence on the part of plaintiff.

Read the full summary

From the circuit court of "Warren county. Hon. J. D. Gilland, Judge. Appellant brought this action against the city of Vicksburg to recover the value of a horse which was struck and killed by a hose-reel, which was being rapidly driven to a fire in the corporate limits. It is admitted that the death of the horse was the direct result of negligence on the part of the driver of the hose-reel and that there was no negligence on the part of plaintiff. It was further admitted that the fire department was at that time under the direct control, management and operation of the city, and that the…

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

It is held generally, if not universally, by the courts of this country that in cases of the class to which this belongs, the municipality is not liable, as is abundantly shown by the citations of counsel on both sides, which see.

Affirmed.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Pass Christian v. Fernandez ex rel. FernandezMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  2. City of Hattiesburg v. GeigorMississippi Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Long v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Byrnes v. City of JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Bradley v. City of JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API