Legal Opinion
Marouf v. Azar
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 12, 2019No. Case No. 18-cv-00378 (APM)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiffs then brought this action. They assert violations of the Establishment Clause and the Equal Protection Clause and a deprivation of Substantive Due Process. Plaintiffs allege that HHS unconstitutionally awarded grant money to USCCB, despite knowing that USCCB and its sub-grantees, due to their religious beliefs, *26would use taxpayer funds in a manner that discriminates against same-sex couples.
The merits of Plaintiffs' case are not yet before the court. Instead, Defendants challenge Plaintiffs' standing to bring suit. For the reasons that follow, the court grants Defendants' Motions to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Daly v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Passut v. DevosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Texas Low Income Housing Information Service v. CarsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019