Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Porter

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 15, 1817PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In covenant broken, on a conveyance of land with a covenant that the premises granted were free of encumbrances, it was agreed that, prior to the conveyance, a creditor of the grantor had attached the same land on mesne process, and after the conveyance had extended his execution on a part thereof.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court

observed that here was an actual eviction under a paramount title, and as this had been ruled, in the * case last cited, to be a breach of the covenant against encumbrances, the proper measure of damages would be the sum at which the land was appraised, with interest thereon from the time of the eviction ; and judgment was entered accordingly upon the default of the defendant.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marston v. HobbsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  2. Gore v. BrazierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  3. Mitchell v. WarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825
  4. Langdon v. PotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  5. Chapel v. BullMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API