Legal Opinion

Carroll v. South Carolina Department of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 26, 2010No. 4678PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

David Carroll appeals an Administrative Law Court (ALC) order affirming his license suspension for registering an alcohol concentration of 0.15% or greater. Carroll argues the ALC erred in finding he was not prejudiced by the arresting officer’s failure to advise him of his implied consent rights in writing as required by section 56-5-2950(B) of the South Carolina Code (Supp.2009). We affirm.

FACTS

On May 28, 2007, State Trooper Lance Corporal Stack received a “BOLO” (be on the lookout) alert for a grey-colored vehicle reportedly “all over the road.” Trooper Stack was approaching a vehicle…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Taylor v. South Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Taylor v. South Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carroll v. SC DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETYCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API