Legal Opinion

State v. Benson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 14, 1992No. C9-91-1482 to C2-91-1484PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Premised on a state public safety officer’s application, a trial judge issued two March 1991 orders authorizing the installation of “pen registers.”1 Information re*48ceived through use of the pen registers led at least in part to the issuance of a search warrant in April 1991. Subsequently, the trial court suppressed evidence obtained through execution of the search warrant, premised on the conclusion that the applications for the pen register installations contained insufficient information. On the state’s appeal from this suppression order, we reverse.

FACTS

In March 1991,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. People v. SporlederSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. BeaufordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. FaklerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. State v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API