Legal Opinion

Cussen v. Brandt & Dunlop

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 16, 1899PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Chancery Court of the city of Richmond pronounced November 10, 1897, in a suit in chancery wherein the appellees, Brandt and Dunlop^ trastees, were the complainants, and the appellant and others were the defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

On the 15th day of December, 1892, Charles H. Talbott executed a deed of trust on certain improved real estate in the city of Richmond to secure the payment of twenty negotiable notes, aggregating thirty-five thousand, eight hundred dollars ($35,800), drawn by Talbott, to his own order, payable at the City Bank of Richmond, and secured in the order of their maturity. The first note was payable six months from that date, and the other nineteen notes were each payable six months later than its immediate predecessor, the last or twentieth note of the series being payable ten years after date.

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wood v. Guarantee Trust and Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Ketchum v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Angle v. North-Western Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Dodge v. Freedman's Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Arents v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1868

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Perkins v. HallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Union Trust Corp. v. FugateSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  3. Gilmer v. WoodsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  4. Citizens Trust Co. v. WardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Selden v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API