Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dennis L. STEPHENS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert G. BORG, Warden, Respondent-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 11, 1995No. 93-15711Published

1DissentAldisert, Circuit Judge

I would reverse the denial of Dennis L. Stephens’ petition for writ of habeas corpus. Accordingly, I dissent.

As the majority note, an accused has “a fundamental right to be clearly informed of the nature and cause of the charges in order to permit adequate preparation of a defense.” Sheppard v. Rees, 909 F.2d 1234, 1236 (9th Cir.1989). Thus, “Due process entitles an accused to know the charges against which he must defend in order to have a reasonable *937opportunity to prepare and present a defense and not be taken by surprise at trial.” Usher v. Gomez, 775 F.Supp. 1308, 1313 (N.D.Cal.1991),…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Irving Sheppard v. Robert ReesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Robert Dale Gray v. Robert RainesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. People v. BernalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Usher v. GomezDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API