Legal Opinion

Jones v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 20, 1978No. 78-1238PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Ivo Jones commenced this action against four manufacturers of the swine flu vaccine, seeking damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by a swine flu innoeulation that had been administered to him. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 247b(k),1 the District Court permitted the United States to substitute itself as a defendant in the lawsuit. The court granted the government’s motion to dismiss Jones’s action based upon his failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

42 U.S.C. § 247b(k)(2)(A) provides that claims arising under the Swine Flu Act are governed by the procedures of the Federal Tort Claims…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marie and Donald Ducharme v. Merrill-National Laboratories, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Jones v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mary E. Hammond, Individually and Mary E. Hammond as She is the of the Estate of Charles E. Hammond v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  2. Robert Vernon Bruce v. United States of America, the General Services Administration and Ralph W. McCannCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  3. Alvarez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1980
  4. Bean v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1980
  5. In Re Swine Flu Immunization Products, Etc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API