Legal Opinion
Kuta v. Joint District No. 50(J)
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 9, 1990No. 89SC328PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rovira
The petitioners, Cynthia Kuta and Marius DeGabriele, assert that the respondent, Joint District No. 50(J) of the counties of Delta, Gunnison, Mesa, and Montrose (District), breached its teaching contracts by not complying with its RIF (reduction in force) policy.1 The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the District, and the court of appeals affirmed in an unpublished decision, Kuta v. Joint Dist. No. 50(J), No. 87CA1794 (April 6, 1989). Because we conclude that the RIF policy had not been incorporated into the contracts of these nontenured teachers, we affirm.
I
The petitioners…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. KeenanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Radiology Professional Corp. v. Trinidad Area Health Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Subryan v. Regents of the University of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Bevsek v. Huerfano School District Re-1Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Schaefer v. Horton-CaveyColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by38 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. HuizarSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Dorman v. Petrol Aspen, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Patrick Vasey v. Martin Marietta Corporation, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Rogers v. Westerman Farm Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.