United States v. Conrad Inv. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
WORVERTON, District Judge.
The facts relevant and material to an understanding of the issues involved by the present controversy are, in brief, as follows: The Blackfeet Indian reservation, by its present boundaries, was established by a convention with the Indians, as shown by Act Cong. May 1, 1888, c. 213, 25 Stat. 113, 129. Birch creek forms its southern and southeasternmost boundary; the line of separation being in the center of the' stream. This creek has its source by several branches in the Rocky Mountains, and traverses public lands of the United States before it touches the reserve,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Pine River Logging Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Basey v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Atchison v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Broder v. Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hough v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- PPL MONTANA, LLC v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- Byers v. We-Wa-NeOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- United States v. Truckee-Carson Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Utah Tower & Light Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.