Legal Opinion

People v. Brumas

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 16, 1990No. 3—89—0558 through 3—89—0562 consPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This case comes on appeal for a second time pursuant to defendant’s petition for post-conviction relief. In the first appeal, this court determined that defendant was entitled to an evidentiary hearing for the purpose of determining whether defendant was the victim of ineffective assistance of counsel, thereby making his guilty pleas involuntary. (See People v. Brumas (1986), 142 Ill. App. 3d 178, 491 N.E.2d 773.) An evidentiary hearing was subsequently held after which the trial court denied defendant’s petition for post-conviction relief. Defendant now appeals the trial court’s order…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. CosletIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. WashingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. FifeIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. EvansAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. LawrenceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. People v. MurphyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API