Blakeney v. Ferguson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal fiorn Pulaski Circuit Court in Chancery. Hon. W. H. Feild, Circuit Judge, presiding. This cause was argued at length upon other points made than those decided: referring to 2 Paul. Ch. Pr. 982. 1 Greenl. Ev. sec. 178, note 4 and 5. Whiting <£• Slark vs. Beebe, 7 Eng. 421, that the answer of Moses Ferguson was evidence against his co-defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott
On the first day of the April term 1845 of the Pulaski-Circuit-Court, the appellant became the purchaser of the land in controversy. It was sold as the property of Moses Ferguson, by virtue-of an execution, against him and one Michael Hogan, in favor of one Nathaniel Midgett, upon a judgment obtained in May, 1843. During that term the appellant obtained a writ of possession upon his motion, to which Moses Ferguson appeared; From the judgment of the Pulaski Circuit Court granting the writ of possession, an appeal was taken to this court, where .in the month of October, 1845, the judgment of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Taylor v. MasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harris v. KingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1855
- Hanover National Bank v. KleinMississippi Supreme Court · 1886
- Graham v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940