Legal Opinion
Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. United States
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided March 31, 1998No. 1:96-cv-00337PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
COLLIER, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants United States of America and United States of America Army Corps of Engineers’s (collectively “United States”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Court File No. 11). Plaintiffs Saint Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (“St.Paul”) and Serodino, Inc. (“Serodi-no”) responded (Court File No. 14) and the United States replied (Court File No. 34).
For the following reasons, the Court will GRANT the United States’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Remaining for adjudication are Chris Gray’s claims against Serodino.
I. PERTINENT FACTS
The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gutierrez v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Keene Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Edward L. Lowe v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, a Division of Litton Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Barbara Jean Johnson, Cross-Appellant v. Offshore Express, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rannals v. Diamond Jo CasinoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003