Monroe Redevelopment Agency v. Faulk
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentAyres, Judge
For reasons hereinafter assigned, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion and decree.
These are expropriation proceedings wherein properties of defendants are sought to be taken as declared in plaintiff’s petitions “for the purpose of the Monroe Floodwall Gap” project.
The properties of defendants, including the improvements thereon, are located on the east, or left, descending bank of the Ouachita River and face South Grand Street across, if not directly, at least obliquely, from the Ouachita Parish Courthouse. On these properties and in the buildings located thereon, the owners…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Stern v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Lewis v. Commissioners of Bourbon Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Succession of BakerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- Rea v. City of LaFayetteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.