Miller v. Phillips
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice;
The appeal is from a decree on final settlement of the administration of an estate in the probate court.
The distributees appeal. The assignments of error relate to sundry items of debit and credit.
Appellee argues these questions cannot be reviewed because the bill of ex ceptions does not recite that it contains all the evidence before the trial judge. The recital in this regard is: “This was substantially all the testimony.” “Testimony,” it is insisted, is of more limited import than “evidence,” in that the latter may include much documentary matter offered apart from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gould v. HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
- Henderson v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
- Englehardt v. Yung's HeirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Benagh v. TurrentineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- McCollum v. McCollumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Webb v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948