Legal Opinion

Beckham v. Short

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 5, 1989No. 23032PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Chief Justice:

This is an action to enforce an alleged oral trust of real property. We granted certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Beckham v. Short, 294 S. C. 415, 365 S. E. (2d) 42 (Ct. App. 1988). We affirm the result reached in the .Court of Appeals’ opinion.

FACTS

Respondent Beckham (Father) deeded his home and eighty-four (84) acres of land to Petitioner Short (Daughter) in 1985. In 1986, Father sued Daughter, claiming she wrongfully refused to reconvey the property. Father sought a declaration from the court that Daughter held the property for his benefit…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kinsey v. BennettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
  2. Beckham v. ShortCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. All Saints Parish v. Protestant Episcopal Church in DioceseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Alston v. Blue Ridge Transfer Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  3. New Prospect Area Fire District v. New Prospect Ruritan ClubSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina v. Episcopal ChurchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  5. Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina v. Episcopal ChurchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API