Legal Opinion

Belk v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board Of Education

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 8, 2000No. 99-2389Published

1Opinion of the Court

211 F.3d 853 (4th Cir. 2000)

TERRY BELK; DWAYNE COLLINS, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND THE CLASS THEY REPRESENT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

WILLIAM CAPACCHIONE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF CHRISTINA CAPACCHIONE, A MINOR; MICHAEL P. GRANT; RICHARD EASTERLING; LAWRENCE GAUVREAU; KAREN BENTLEY; CHARLES THOMPSON; SCOTT C. WILLARD, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,

V

THE CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG BOARD OF EDUCATION; ERIC SMITH, SUPERINTENDENT, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; ARTHUR GRIFFIN, CHAIRMAN OF THE CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG SCHOOL BOARD, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, DEFENDANTS.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AMICUS CURIAE.

WILLIAM…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The Goldsboro City Board of Education v. The Wayne County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  2. George Martin, for Himself and in Behalf of His Minor Children, Ellen and Catherine Martin v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  3. Warren H. Wheeler v. The Durham County Board of Education, a Body PoliticCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  4. Belk v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API